Mary Feller’s family of three spends nearly $25,000 a year on health insurance premiums, which is more than they pay on their home’s mortgage in California’s Marin County.
“I think for the first time we’re really scared that we’re going to be without health insurance,” she said. Feller’s especially worried for her 26-year-old daughter, a cancer survivor whose premium has tripled in four years.
That’s why she decided to become a plaintiff in a lawsuit againstCalifornia’s largest for-profit health insurer on behalf of policyholders who were allegedly pushed to take coverage with fewer benefits and higher deductibles.
In a lawsuit filed in Ventura Superior Court on Monday, Anthem Blue Cross is accused of violating a California law requiring health insurersto offer new, comparable coverage or minimize premium increases when they close a policy.
According to the lawsuit, plaintiffs Mary Feller and Randy Freed received similar form letters from the Woodland Hills-based insurer, stating their policies were closed and they could “switch to any Anthem Blue Cross individual health plan with no underwriting required.”
The lawsuit alleges that the few plans Anthem would allow Feller and Freed to switch into had higher premiums, higher deductibles, less coverage, or a combination of those undesirable traits.
Anthem Blue Cross spokeswoman Peggy Hinz said the insurer hasn’t yet reviewed the lawsuit, declining further comment.
The lawsuit seeks class action status and is being brought by Consumer Watchdog, a Santa Monica-based consumer advocacy group, on behalf of Feller and Freed.
When the practice was outlawed in 1993, legislative analysts called it a “death spiral” because rates inevitably increased until policyholders could no longer afford coverage. As the coverage pool shrank over time, rates went up and up.
“It’s a very profitable practice, and what we know is the insurance industry is very focused on short-term returns,” said Jerry Flanagan, a health advocate for Consumer Watchdog.
The lawsuit comes on the heels of government scrutiny of a steepAnthem Blue Cross rate hike for roughly 700,000 individual policyholders in California. The hikes average 25 percent — some premiums will rise as much as 39 percent — but implementation of the hike has been delayed until May 1 while a state regulator investigates.
Anthem executives have blamed the current economic climate, flaws in the national health care system, high costs of health care and fewer young, healthy people holding onto insurance policies for the rate hikes.
The Obama administration has called Anthem’s hike a harbinger of rising premiums in its arguments forhealth care reform.
In special hearings last week, California legislators and the U.S. House of Representatives questioned executives from WellPoint, Anthem’s parent company, about proposed premium hikes in California, Maine and elsewhere.